Blog

Blog

Union Membership Decreased By 200,000 In ‘Right-To-Work’ States In 2024

Union membership in so-called “right-to-work” states saw significant declines in 2024. The Guardian reports: “Add another growing split to the increasingly divided United States: union membership. US states that protect unions’ collective bargaining rights have experienced an increase in new union members, while states with anti-union ‘right to work’ laws are responsible for declines in…

Source

Blog

Understanding the Regular Rate of Pay

In this episode of California Employment News, Weintraub attorneys Ryan Abernethy and Talia Delanoy revisit the complexities of the regular rate of pay—a frequent issue in wage and hour class actions. From bonuses and shift differentials to common employer mistakes, they break down what must (and must not) be included in calculations, and the costly risks of getting it wrong.

Watch this episode on the Weintraub YouTube channel.

Show Notes:

Ryan: Hello, everyone, and thank you for joining us for this installment of California Employment News, an informative video and podcast resource offered by the Labor and Employment Group here at Weintraub Tobin. My name is Ryan Abernethy, and I’m a shareholder in the firm’s Labor and Employment Group. I’m joined today by my partner, Talia Delanoy, who is new to our group, and this is her inaugural episode.

We’re happy to have her join our team here. Over three years ago now, Lukas Clary and I spoke with you about the regular rate of pay. But since the regular rate of pay is such a prevalent issue that is increasingly featured in Wage and Hour class actions that we’re seeing pouring in. We wanted to revisit that topic today.

Talia, why don’t you start us off by giving us a refresher with some basic information about the regular rate of pay, what it is exactly, and what needs to be included within it.

Talia: Yes, absolutely. Thank you, Ryan. Most employers assume that the base rate of pay and employees regular hourly rate is all they need to think about when they calculate overtime and double-time. They just take the base rate of pay, multiply it by one and a half for overtime or two for double time, and that’s it. Unfortunately, the calculation isn’t that simple. The regular rate of pay, which is different from the base rate of pay, actually includes additional income such as non-discretionary bonuses, shift differentials, which is like additional pay when you have an employee use an undesirable schedule or for a weekend or overnight work, piece rate compensation, such as payment per box of fruit picked, or even commissions. Employers need to add to have all of these types of income in addition to the employee’s base hourly rate before calculating both overtime, double time, sick pay, and meal and rest period premium payments. To make this even more complicated, the law requires one calculation for a flat sum bonus, such as $50 paid for weekend work, and another calculation for production bonuses, such as an employee who might earn 5% of all sales in a given month.

Talia: Let’s Let me give you a quick example. If you’re paying an employee a flat-sum bonus, here’s the example. Your employee earns $16 per hour and works 40 straight-time hours and four overtime hours on Saturday. The straight The overtime payment is simple. $16 times 40 hours equals $640. The overtime payment, $24 an hour times 4 hours equals $96. Now, the employee has paid the $50 bonus for working on Saturday. Now you need to calculate the overtime compensation due on the bonus. Now this is where the math comes in. You take $50 in bonus, you divide it by the 40 hours of straight time hours worked, and this gets you $1. 25, which is the per hour value of the bonus. Now you take that $1. 25, you multiply it by 1. 5 for the overtime, and you get $1 87. 5. This is the bonus overtime value per hour. Now you have to actually figure out how much of that goes to the overtime. You take the $1. 87. 5 times the 4 hours of overtime the employee worked, and you get $7. 50. This is the overtime due on the bonus. This is the part that most employers miss.

Talia: When you add all of that up, the total straight time pay, the total overtime pay, the $50 flat sum bonus, and that $7. 50 over time owed on the bonus, you get a total of $793. 50.

Ryan: Well, thank you, Talia. How about some good news now that we realize that a lot of us out there might be underpaying our employees based on the regular rate? Let’s discuss what doesn’t need to be included in the regular rate. There are at least three categories of items that can be excluded from the regular rate calculation because they’re not considered wages. The first exclusion is for payments that could be categorized as gifts or gratuities. This would include employer contributions to retirement life or other insurance benefits. Benefits. It also includes holiday bonuses or other payments given to employees that are considered rewards for service or rewards for loyalty, so long as the amounts paid are not directly measured by the employee’s hours worked or the employee’s production or efficiency. The second category of item that can be excluded from the regular rate includes items and payments that are made for periods where no work is performed. This is stuff like vacation pay, paid sick sick pay or similar payments. The third category is expense reimbursements, which are obviously not considered wages. Now, this shouldn’t be confused with per diem payments, which usually are required to be included in the regular rate of pay calculations.

In addition, the cost or the value of loggings or meals that the company provides to employees often must be included as well in the regular rate of pay under certain circumstances. It’s pretty detailed, so we won’t get into that today, but just be aware of that. It’s also important to remember that premium payments must be paid at the regular rate of pay, not the base hourly rate. Just a refresher, under California law, not exempt employees who are not providing compliant meal or rest breaks are entitled to an extra hour of pay under the labor code. This payment is called a premium. We discuss this premium in more detail in other episodes. But many employers pay these premiums out at the employer’s base hourly rate, and that’s a mistake because the California Supreme Court has clarified that premiums must actually be paid at the often higher regular rate of pay. That would be a violation just by getting that wrong. Sick leave must also be paid out the regular rate of pay and not the base hourly rate. Talia, why don’t you share with us some of the risks employers face for getting the regular rate wrong?

Talia: Absolutely, yeah. Unfortunately, regular rate of pay violations are low hanging fruit. An attorney need only request the employee’s payroll records, which the employers are obligated to provide, and they do some simple math to see if there are violations. If an employee’s pay stub shows an overtime rate that is exactly one and a half times the base rate of pay in the same pay period that the employee earned a bonus or other income like we discussed earlier, then that lawyer knows they have a slam dunk case. In the example that I gave earlier, if an employer neglected If you wanted to include that Saturday work bonus in the overtime calculation, that $7. 50 omission could cost the employer thousands of dollars. This is made up of significant penalties, $100 per employee per pay pay period and up to 30 days of pay at the employee’s full daily rate if the error is discovered after the employee quits or is terminated. The damages also include interest, potential liquidated damages, and payment of the employee’s attorney’s fees. This is a huge sum of money for missing a payment of just $7. 50. Employers, unfortunately, can also be subject to class action liability if they fail to use the regular rate of pay for all of their employees.

Talia: In this very scary turn, those damages can extend back four years from when an employee files a lawsuit.

Ryan: Thank you, Talia. We know this is a scary topic for some, and it’s pretty complicated. You can always reach out to one of our attorneys here at Weintraub if you have any specific questions about the regular rate or how to calculate production bonuses. With that, that’ll do it for today. We thank you all for joining us. You can continue to find California Employment News at our blog at www.thelelawblog.com and wherever you listen to your favorite podcasts. With that, we’ll see you next time. Thank you for joining us.

Talia: Thank you.

Blog

So You’ve Received a PAGA Letter, Now What? Attend Our Webinar to Find Out Your Next Steps

Before someone can file an action under PAGA (Private Attorneys General Act), they have to file a letter with the LWDA and set forth what they think the employer did wrong. The LWDA has 60-days to review the letter and decide whether to investigate the issues. If the LWDA does not take action (and they rarely, if ever, do), then a PAGA complaint can be filed 65 days after the letter was first submitted to the LWDA.

Under PAGA reform, that PAGA letter triggers a 60-day review period, where employers can audit their practices and take steps to fix issues. If they do so proactively, and retain evidence of the audit and its results, available PAGA penalties can be discounted as much as 70% (or 85% if they audit before getting a PAGA letter). Given that PAGA penalties accumulate per employee at the rate of at least $100 per pay period with a violation, that means taking quick action can save thousands of dollars.

That’s why I am speaking about what to do upon receipt of a PAGA letter at my firm’s upcoming webinar on Employment Class & Collective Actions: Strategies for Defense and Compliance on September 30, 2025. The webinar starts at 9 am PT, and my session will be at 11 am PT.

Other topics covered at the webinar will be:

  • Preventing systemic discrimination class actions caused by AI.
  • Navigating worker misclassification issues.
  • Preparing for the EEOC’s focus on systemic religious discrimination.

Other featured speakers include: Nikki H. HowellSteven W. Moore, and Renee J. Sheyko.

You may sign up for this webinar here.

Start being proactive today! Sign up and be ready when that LWDA letter hits your inbox.

Blog

Thank You All For A Great Union Night At Dodger Stadium

Thousands of union brothers and sisters got together on August 30 for Labor 411’s Union Night at Dodger Stadium. The event is an annual tradition celebrating the Los Angeles labor community in a fun setting of baseball and camaraderie. Los Angeles County Firefighters, IAFF Local 1014 President Dave Gillotte provided the honor of throwing the…

Source

Blog

Long Beach Cracks Down on Self-Checkout: What Employers Must Know by Sept. 21

The City of Long Beach recently passed an ordinance that imposes new staffing and operational requirements on grocery and drug stores using self-service checkout (“SCO”) systems. The law, Ordinance No. ORD-25-0010, was approved on August 21, 2025, and goes into effect September 21, 2025.

For this week’s Friday’s Five, here are the five key points business owners should know and why employers need to understand the dynamics at issue here:

1. Who is Covered?

The ordinance applies to two types of retail establishments operating within the City of Long Beach:

Food Retail Establishments:

The ordinance defines Food Retail Establishments as:

“retail store that is either: (1) over fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet in size and sells primarily household foodstuff for offsite including fresh produce, meats, poultry, fish, deli products, dairy products, canned foods, dry foods, beverages, baked foods and/or prepared foods (other household supplies or products are secondary to the primary purpose of food sales); or (2) over eighty-five thousand (85,000) square feet and with ten percent (10%) of their sales floor area dedicated to the sale of non-taxable merchandise including the sale of fresh produce, meats, poultry, fish, deli products, dairy products, canned foods, dry foods, beverages, baked foods and/or prepared foods.”

Drug Retail Establishments:

The ordinance defines Drug Retail Establishments as:

“retail store that sells a variety of prescription and nonprescription medicines and miscellaneous items, including drugs, pharmaceuticals, sundries, fresh produce, meats, poultry, fish, deli products, dairy products, canned foods, dry foods, beverages, prepared foods, and other merchandise.”

2. Checkout Requirements

  • If SCO stations are available, the store must also have at least one traditional staffed checkout station open at the same time.
  • SCO shall limit sales (and advertise this) to 15 items or fewer.
  • Certain items cannot be sold through SCO:
    • Alcohol and tobacco (anything requiring ID).
    • Items with theft-deterrent devices (tags, locked cases).

3. Staffing Ratios

The ordinance establishes strict staffing rules:

  • At least one dedicated employee must supervise SCO stations whenever they are in operation.
  • If more than one SCO station is open, the store must maintain a 1:3 ratio (one employee for every three SCO stations).
  • Supervising employees may not be assigned other tasks that interfere with SCO monitoring.

4. Enforcement and Penalties

  • Private right of action: Customers and employees can sue for violations.
  • Penalties start at $100 per employee, per day, escalating by $100 each day until cured, up to $1,000 per employee, per day.
  • Prevailing plaintiffs can also recover attorneys’ fees and costs.
  • The ordinance prohibits retaliation against employees who exercise their rights under this law.

5. Effective Date

The ordinance was adopted by the Long Beach City Council on August 12, 2025, approved by the Mayor on August 21, 2025, and becomes effective September 21, 2025.

My Take: A Dangerous Path for Regulating Automation

While the ordinance is framed as a measure to reduce retail theft and protect workers, it sets a troubling precedent. By mandating staffing ratios and limiting how self-checkouts may be used, the City of Long Beach is effectively regulating automation out of existence in grocery and drug retail stores.

This is dangerous for three reasons:

  1. Competitive Disadvantage: Other cities and states allow businesses to adopt new technologies to stay competitive. By imposing labor mandates on technology, Long Beach is tying the hands of local businesses while competitors in neighboring jurisdictions can modernize more freely.
  2. Policy Overreach: Instead of targeting criminal activity directly, the ordinance burdens employers with staffing requirements and liability exposure. The risk is that this type of regulation spreads to other municipalities or industries, making it harder for businesses to innovate and control costs. 
  3. May Create Additional Legal Obligations for The City: If businesses comply with these regulations but the City fails to provide adequate police presence to protect employees and property, employers may argue the City has created a legal burden for itself. Because the ordinance is explicitly tied to public safety and theft prevention, a lack of sufficient law enforcement could be framed as bad faith regulation or an unreasonable regulatory scheme, raising broader legal challenges. 

Employers should pay close attention—not only to compliance with this ordinance but also to the larger policy trend it represents.  While this ordinance currently targets grocery and drug stores, it sets a precedent for how local governments may regulate the use of automation more broadly. If this approach spreads, employers in retail, hospitality, manufacturing, and beyond could face similar mandates that drive up costs and restrict their ability to innovate.

The post Long Beach Cracks Down on Self-Checkout: What Employers Must Know by Sept. 21 appeared first on California Employment Law Report.

Blog

3 September, 2025 19:29

Empowering California Workers Against Labor Violations

California’s Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA), enacted in 2004, remains a powerful tool for workers in 2025, allowing them to sue employers for Labor Code violations like wage theft and overtime denials. With over $10 billion recovered in settlements, PAGA addresses systemic abuses. The Workers Rights Compliance Alliance (WRCA) highlights how workers can use PAGA to fight unfair treatment, from unpaid wages to unsafe conditions, ensuring justice for employees and their coworkers. Learn more: www.youtube.com/watch?v=uRWi34gnSRE.

Blog

3 September, 2025 19:26

Home Care Companies Flout Laws, Caregivers Pay the Price

Despite hefty penalties—over $9 million in 2023 alone—many California home care companies continue to operate outside labor laws, leaving caregivers uninsured and vulnerable. Paid in cash and labeled as contractors, these workers face significant risks without recourse. The Workers Rights Compliance Alliance is calling for accountability and better protections for those who care for others.

Discover how to support caregivers’ rights:

.

Blog

Know Your Rights: A Call to Action for Caregivers and Employers

Know Your Rights: A Call to Action for Caregivers and Employers

Caregivers in California deserve fair treatment, but many are left without workers’ comp or insurance due to widespread misclassification. The WRCA is urging caregivers and those hiring them to understand their rights and demand accountability. Whether you’re a caregiver or an employer, it’s time to act to ensure safety and fairness in the home care industry.

Find out how to take a stand with WRCA: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kY2-2yM_gos.

Below is a consolidated list of all 20 blog posts created based on the provided document about the Workers Rights Compliance Alliance (WRCA) and the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) in California, referencing the YouTube video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uRWi34gnSRE.

Blog

PAGA: Empowering California Workers Against Labor Violations

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uRWi34gnSRE

California’s Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA), enacted in 2004, remains a powerful tool for workers in 2025, allowing them to sue employers for Labor Code violations like wage theft and overtime denials. With over $10 billion recovered in settlements, PAGA addresses systemic abuses. The Workers Rights Compliance Alliance (WRCA) highlights how workers can use PAGA to fight unfair treatment, from unpaid wages to unsafe conditions, ensuring justice for employees and their coworkers.

Learn more about PAGA’s impact at Workers Rights Compliance Alliance.

Categories: Labor Rights, PAGA
Tags: PAGA, worker rights, WRCA, California labor laws, wage theft, labor justice, employee empowerment
Featured Image: Upload an image of workers advocating for rights. Alt text: “California workers advocating for PAGA.”

Blog

The Hidden Crisis of Wildfire Cleanup Workers

The Hidden Crisis of Wildfire Cleanup Workers

Every year, California’s wildfires devastate landscapes, but a lesser-known crisis emerges in their aftermath. Undocumented day laborers, often hired to clear toxic debris like asbestos and lead, face hazardous conditions without proper safety gear, fair wages, or legal protections. The Workers Rights Compliance Alliance (WRCA) is shining a light on this injustice, advocating for better treatment and accountability for these essential workers.

Watch the full story and learn how to support their fight for justice: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FU3nTsJ-GoY.

Scroll to Top