Facing the Cards You Wish You Had

What poker can teach us about relationships

Every poker player knows the most dangerous hand at the table is not the one in front of him. It is the one he keeps imagining: the flush he folded too early, the ace that would have come if he had stayed. A player who spends the evening playing the imaginary hand plays the real one badly — chasing, bitter, a step behind every decision. Family life has its own version of that trap, and it is among the most quietly corrosive sorrows I encountered in my practice. It is the grief for the family you imagined and did not get.

The forms it takes are as varied as families themselves. The couple who planned for children and learned, one doctor’s appointment at a time, that children were not coming. The parents whose child arrived with disabilities or illness, and who had to grieve the ordinary future they had pictured — the ball games, the graduations — even while loving, fiercely, the child actually in their arms. The man whose father was cold or absent, who becomes a father himself and discovers, holding his own son, exactly what he missed. The woman whose mother died young, who reaches for the phone at every milestone and remembers, again, there is no one to call.

What makes this grief so hard is that it has no funeral. When a person dies, the world gives you permission to mourn. When a possibility dies — the child, the parent, the marriage as imagined — there is no ceremony, no date, often no words, and others may not even know a loss occurred. The couple grieving infertility sits through baby showers. The adult child grieving the father he needed watches other men’s fathers coach Little League. The grief keeps arriving without an expiration date, and, being invisible, it often goes untended for years.

Untended, it does what unplayed grief always does: it leaks into the hand you are actually holding. It becomes resentment toward a spouse for a sorrow that is not the spouse’s fault. It becomes impatience with the real child, measured silently against the imagined one. It becomes envy that poisons friendships, withdrawal that bewilders the family. I sat with clients dividing property who could not explain their own bitterness; when the story came out, it was rarely about the property. It was about a life that had not matched the picture, and a grief that had never once been said out loud.

The way through begins with a refusal: refusing to treat the grief as disloyalty. Loving the child you have and grieving the imagined future are not opposites; parents do both, and the grief does not diminish the love — pretending otherwise only drives the sorrow underground where it can do damage. Grief over what will never be is not a verdict on what is. It is simply loss, and it deserves to be named before it can be carried well.

Naming it is most of the work. Say it plainly, to your spouse or one trusted friend: this is the family I pictured; this is the loss; it still hurts. Couples who can say it find the grief becomes something they hold together rather than a wall between them — one more hard hand played as a team. Some mark the loss with a small act of their own making, since the world provides no ceremony: a letter written and kept, a donation in a name never used, a prayer, a walk on the hard anniversary. Ritual is how we tell ourselves a loss was real, and invented ritual works, because the loss was.

And then, slowly, the second refusal: refusing to keep playing the imaginary hand. The spouse in front of you is not a consolation prize. The child in your arms is not the remainder after a subtraction. At some point — not on anyone else’s schedule — the work turns toward the actual cards, and toward the discovery that a hand honestly grieved can be honestly played, and sometimes played into a life richer than the picture.

Here is the takeaway. This week, name one loss of the imagined kind — on paper or aloud to your spouse: the child, the parent, the future, the version of the marriage you pictured. Give it one honest sentence of grief, without apology and without comparing it to anyone else’s sorrow. If it helps, give it one small act of acknowledgment — a letter, a prayer, a candle, a name spoken at the table. Then turn back to the hand you are holding and choose one real person in it to attend to today. The cards you wish you had are not coming. The ones in front of you are waiting to be played, and they deserve a player who is at the table.

What poker can teach us about relationships

Every poker player knows the most dangerous hand at the table is not the one in front of him. It is the one he keeps imagining: the flush he folded too early, the ace that would have come if he had stayed. A player who spends the evening playing the imaginary hand plays the real one badly — chasing, bitter, a step behind every decision. Family life has its own version of that trap, and it is among the most quietly corrosive sorrows I encountered in my practice. It is the grief for the family you imagined and did not get.

The forms it takes are as varied as families themselves. The couple who planned for children and learned, one doctor’s appointment at a time, that children were not coming. The parents whose child arrived with disabilities or illness, and who had to grieve the ordinary future they had pictured — the ball games, the graduations — even while loving, fiercely, the child actually in their arms. The man whose father was cold or absent, who becomes a father himself and discovers, holding his own son, exactly what he missed. The woman whose mother died young, who reaches for the phone at every milestone and remembers, again, there is no one to call.

What makes this grief so hard is that it has no funeral. When a person dies, the world gives you permission to mourn. When a possibility dies — the child, the parent, the marriage as imagined — there is no ceremony, no date, often no words, and others may not even know a loss occurred. The couple grieving infertility sits through baby showers. The adult child grieving the father he needed watches other men’s fathers coach Little League. The grief keeps arriving without an expiration date, and, being invisible, it often goes untended for years.

Untended, it does what unplayed grief always does: it leaks into the hand you are actually holding. It becomes resentment toward a spouse for a sorrow that is not the spouse’s fault. It becomes impatience with the real child, measured silently against the imagined one. It becomes envy that poisons friendships, withdrawal that bewilders the family. I sat with clients dividing property who could not explain their own bitterness; when the story came out, it was rarely about the property. It was about a life that had not matched the picture, and a grief that had never once been said out loud.

The way through begins with a refusal: refusing to treat the grief as disloyalty. Loving the child you have and grieving the imagined future are not opposites; parents do both, and the grief does not diminish the love — pretending otherwise only drives the sorrow underground where it can do damage. Grief over what will never be is not a verdict on what is. It is simply loss, and it deserves to be named before it can be carried well.

Naming it is most of the work. Say it plainly, to your spouse or one trusted friend: this is the family I pictured; this is the loss; it still hurts. Couples who can say it find the grief becomes something they hold together rather than a wall between them — one more hard hand played as a team. Some mark the loss with a small act of their own making, since the world provides no ceremony: a letter written and kept, a donation in a name never used, a prayer, a walk on the hard anniversary. Ritual is how we tell ourselves a loss was real, and invented ritual works, because the loss was.

And then, slowly, the second refusal: refusing to keep playing the imaginary hand. The spouse in front of you is not a consolation prize. The child in your arms is not the remainder after a subtraction. At some point — not on anyone else’s schedule — the work turns toward the actual cards, and toward the discovery that a hand honestly grieved can be honestly played, and sometimes played into a life richer than the picture.

Here is the takeaway. This week, name one loss of the imagined kind — on paper or aloud to your spouse: the child, the parent, the future, the version of the marriage you pictured. Give it one honest sentence of grief, without apology and without comparing it to anyone else’s sorrow. If it helps, give it one small act of acknowledgment — a letter, a prayer, a candle, a name spoken at the table. Then turn back to the hand you are holding and choose one real person in it to attend to today. The cards you wish you had are not coming. The ones in front of you are waiting to be played, and they deserve a player who is at the table.

What poker can teach us about relationships

Every poker player knows the most dangerous hand at the table is not the one in front of him. It is the one he keeps imagining: the flush he folded too early, the ace that would have come if he had stayed. A player who spends the evening playing the imaginary hand plays the real one badly — chasing, bitter, a step behind every decision. Family life has its own version of that trap, and it is among the most quietly corrosive sorrows I encountered in my practice. It is the grief for the family you imagined and did not get.

The forms it takes are as varied as families themselves. The couple who planned for children and learned, one doctor’s appointment at a time, that children were not coming. The parents whose child arrived with disabilities or illness, and who had to grieve the ordinary future they had pictured — the ball games, the graduations — even while loving, fiercely, the child actually in their arms. The man whose father was cold or absent, who becomes a father himself and discovers, holding his own son, exactly what he missed. The woman whose mother died young, who reaches for the phone at every milestone and remembers, again, there is no one to call.

What makes this grief so hard is that it has no funeral. When a person dies, the world gives you permission to mourn. When a possibility dies — the child, the parent, the marriage as imagined — there is no ceremony, no date, often no words, and others may not even know a loss occurred. The couple grieving infertility sits through baby showers. The adult child grieving the father he needed watches other men’s fathers coach Little League. The grief keeps arriving without an expiration date, and, being invisible, it often goes untended for years.

Untended, it does what unplayed grief always does: it leaks into the hand you are actually holding. It becomes resentment toward a spouse for a sorrow that is not the spouse’s fault. It becomes impatience with the real child, measured silently against the imagined one. It becomes envy that poisons friendships, withdrawal that bewilders the family. I sat with clients dividing property who could not explain their own bitterness; when the story came out, it was rarely about the property. It was about a life that had not matched the picture, and a grief that had never once been said out loud.

The way through begins with a refusal: refusing to treat the grief as disloyalty. Loving the child you have and grieving the imagined future are not opposites; parents do both, and the grief does not diminish the love — pretending otherwise only drives the sorrow underground where it can do damage. Grief over what will never be is not a verdict on what is. It is simply loss, and it deserves to be named before it can be carried well.

Naming it is most of the work. Say it plainly, to your spouse or one trusted friend: this is the family I pictured; this is the loss; it still hurts. Couples who can say it find the grief becomes something they hold together rather than a wall between them — one more hard hand played as a team. Some mark the loss with a small act of their own making, since the world provides no ceremony: a letter written and kept, a donation in a name never used, a prayer, a walk on the hard anniversary. Ritual is how we tell ourselves a loss was real, and invented ritual works, because the loss was.

And then, slowly, the second refusal: refusing to keep playing the imaginary hand. The spouse in front of you is not a consolation prize. The child in your arms is not the remainder after a subtraction. At some point — not on anyone else’s schedule — the work turns toward the actual cards, and toward the discovery that a hand honestly grieved can be honestly played, and sometimes played into a life richer than the picture.

Here is the takeaway. This week, name one loss of the imagined kind — on paper or aloud to your spouse: the child, the parent, the future, the version of the marriage you pictured. Give it one honest sentence of grief, without apology and without comparing it to anyone else’s sorrow. If it helps, give it one small act of acknowledgment — a letter, a prayer, a candle, a name spoken at the table. Then turn back to the hand you are holding and choose one real person in it to attend to today. The cards you wish you had are not coming. The ones in front of you are waiting to be played, and they deserve a player who is at the table.

Scroll to Top